Obschie trebovaniya. Stat'ya predstavlyaetsya v elektronnom vide cherez lichnyy kabinet avtora na sayte: «Lingvistika i obrazovanie» Nazvanie fayla Stat'ya_Familiya.

Elektronnyy variant stat'i vypolnyaetsya v tekstovom redaktore Microsoft Word i sohranyaetsya s rasshireniem .doc ili docx.

Parametry stranicy. Format A4 (knizhnyy). Polya: vse po 20 mm.

Formatirovanie osnovnogo teksta. Abzacnyy otstup 1,25 sm.

Mezhstrochnyy interval shapki stat'i – odinarnyy, teksta stat'i – polutornyy. Numeraciya stranic raspolagaetsya vnizu stranicy v uglu sprava. Shrift Times New Roman, Obychnyy. Razmer keglya (simvolov) – 14 pt.

Ob'em stat'i. Minimal'nyy ob'em stat'i 8 stranic, maksimal'nyy ob'em – do 12 stranic mashinopisnogo teksta.

Trebovaniya k sostavu publikuemoy stat'i.

Publikuemaya v zhurnale stat'ya dolzhna sostoyat' iz sleduyuschih posledovatel'no raspolozhennyh elementov:

• «Nauchnaya stat'ya» – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• indeks (UDK) – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• zagolovok (nazvanie) stat'i na russkom yazyke – po centru, zaglavnymi bukvami, shrift 14pt, poluzhirnyy;
• imya, otchestvo i familiya avtora (ov) na russkom yazyke – sleva, shrift 12pt, poluzhirnyy;
• svedeniya o meste raboty (ucheby) avtorov na russkom yazyke ukazyvayut posle imen avtorov na raznyh strokah i svyazyvayut s imenami s pomosch'yu nadstrochnyh cifrovyh oboznacheniy1) (nazvanie vuza, oblast', gorod, strana) – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• elektronnaya pochta avtora (ov), http://orcid.org/0000… – sleva, shrift 12pt
• annotaciya na russkom yazyke – shrift 12pt;
• klyuchevye slova na russkom yazyke – shrift 12pt;
• «Original article» – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• zagolovok (nazvanie) stat'i na angliyskom yazyke – po centru, zaglavnymi bukvami, shrift 14pt, poluzhirnyy;
• imya, otchestvo i familiya avtora (ov) – sleva, shrift 12pt, poluzhirnyy na angliyskom yazyke;
• svedeniya o meste raboty (ucheby) avtorov na angliyskom yazyke (nazvanie vuza, oblast', gorod, strana) – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• annotaciya na angliyskom yazyke – shrift 12pt;
• klyuchevye slova – shrift 12pt;
• tekst stat'i – shrift 14pt, interval polutornyy;
• spisok istochnikov – shrift 14pt, interval polutornyy.

Redakciya zhurnala rekomenduet priderzhivat'sya tradicionnoy struktury napisaniya stat'i (vvedenie, celi issledovaniya, metody issledovaniya, poluchennye rezul'taty, obsuzhdenie rezul'tatov i vyvody). Elementy stat'i otdelyayutsya drug ot druga odnoy pustoy strokoy.

Annotaciya. Ob'em – ne prevyshaet 250 slov.

Klyuchevye slova. ne men'she 3 i ne bol'she 15 slov (slovosochetaniy), nesuschih v tekste osnovnuyu smyslovuyu nagruzku.

Spisok istochnikov. Spisok citiruemoy literatury privoditsya v sootvetstvii s trebovaniyami GOST R 7.0.7–2021. Bibliograficheskie zapisi v perechne zatekstovyh bibliograficheskih ssylok numeruyut i raspolagayut v poryadke citirovaniya istochnikov v tekste stat'i.

Bibliograficheskaya zapis'.

Dlya svyazi spiska citiruemoy literatury s tekstom stat'i ispol'zuyut otsylki v sootvetstvii s GOST R 7.0.5-2008 Otsylki v tekste stat'i zaklyuchayut v kvadratnye skobki. Poryadkovyy nomer citiruemogo istochnika privodyat v sootvetstvuyuschey stroke teksta stat'i, naprimer, [5]. Esli ssylku privodyat na konkretnyy fragment teksta dokumenta, v otsylke ukazyvayut poryadkovyy nomer i stranicy, na kotoryh pomeschen ob'ekt ssylki. Svedeniya razdelyayut zapyatoy, naprimer, [5, s. 23].

References sostavlyaetsya v poryadke, polnost'yu identichnom russkoyazychnomu variantu s analogichnoy numeraciey.

References dolzhen byt' oformlen soglasno sleduyuschim pravilam:

• Avtory (transliteraciya), nazvanie stat'i v transliterirovannom variante [perevod nazvaniya stat'i na angliyskiy yazyk v kvadratnyh skobkah], nazvanie russkoyazychnogo istochnika (transliteraciya) [perevod nazvaniya istochnika na angliyskiy yazyk – parafraz (dlya zhurnalov mozhno ne delat')], vyhodnye dannye s oboznacheniyami na angliyskom yazyke. Dlya transliteracii s kirillicy na latinicu rekomenduem ispol'zovat' sistemu avtomaticheskogo transliterirovaniya na sayte http://www.translit.ru (vybrav pri etom opciyu «MVD»).

Zapreschaetsya ispol'zovat' znaki «//» i «-» dlya razdeleniya strukturnyh elementov bibliograficheskogo opisaniya.

Primer:

Familija A.A. Nazvaniestat'i [Title of article]. Nazvanie zhurnala [Title of Journal], 2005, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 49-53.

• predstavlyat' v References opisanie zhurnala tol'ko v transliterirovannom variante (bez perevoda) nedopustimo;
• pri opisanii izdaniy bez avtorov (sbornikov, kollektivnyh monografiy) dopuskaetsya vmesto avtorov pisat' odnogo, maksimum dvuh redaktorov izdaniya;
• dlya neopublikovannyh dokumentov mozhno delat' samoe korotkoe nazvanie s ukazaniem v skobkah (unpublished), esli ono imeet avtorstvo (dlya ucheta ssylok avtora), libo prosto “UnpublishedSource” ili “UnpublishedReport” i t.d., esli avtorstvo v dokumente otsutstvuet;
• tak kak russkoyazychnye istochniki trudno identificiruyutsya zarubezhnymi specialistami, neobhodimo v opisaniyah original'noe nazvanie istochnika vydelyat' kursivom, kak v bol'shinstve zarubezhnyh standartov;
• nezhelatel'no v ssylkah delat' proizvol'nye sokrascheniya nazvaniy istochnikov. Eto chasto privodit k potere svyazki, tak kak nazvanie mozhet byt' ne identificirovano;
• vse osnovnye vyhodnye izdatel'skie svedeniya (v opisaniyah zhurnala: oboznachenie toma, nomera, stranic; v opisaniyah knig: mesto izdaniya – gorod, oboznachenie izdatel'stva (krome sobstvennogo neperevodnogo imeni izdatel'stva, ono transliteriruetsya)) dolzhny byt' predstavleny na angliyskom yazyke;
• v opisaniyah russkoyazychnyh uchebnikov, uchebnyh posobiy ne nado ukazyvat' tip izdaniy;
• v vyhodnyh dannyh publikaciy v ssylkah (statey, knig) neobhodimo ukazyvat' kolichestvo stranic publikacii: diapazon stranic v izdanii ukazyvaetsya “pp.” Pered stranicami; kolichestvo stranic v polnom izdanii (knige) – ukazyvaetsya kak “p.” posle ukazaniya kolichestva stranic;
• perevod zaglaviya stat'i ili istochnika beretsya v kvadratnye skobki;
• odna publikaciya opisyvaetsya v spiske literatury odin raz, nezavisimo ot togo, skol'ko raz v tekste publikacii byl upomyanut istochnik;
• esli kniga v spiske literatury (v lyubom variante – osnovnom ili v References) opisyvaetsya polnost'yu, togda v opisanii dolzhen byt' ukazan polnyy ob'em izdaniya, nezavisimo ot togo, kakie stranicy izdaniya byli procitirovany v tekste; isklyuchenie sostavlyayut sluchai, kogda ispol'zuyutsya otdel'nye glavy iz knigi; v etom variante v spiske literatury daetsya opisanie glavy, s ukazaniem stranic “ot-do”;
• dlya transliteracii neobhodimo ispol'zovat' sistemy avtomaticheskogo perevoda kirillicy v romanskiy alfavit; ne delat' transliteraciyu vruchnuyu;
• dlya zhurnalov, izdayuschihsya na russkom i angliyskom yazykah, ssylka daetsya na angliyskuyu versiyu zhurnala.

Risunki, shemy, diagrammy. V kachestve illyustraciy statey prinimaetsya ne bolee 3 risunkov. Illyustracii dolzhny byt' chetkimi. V tekste stat'i sleduet dat' ssylku na konkretnyy risunok, naprimer, (ris. 2). Na risunkah dolzhno byt' minimal'noe kolichestvo slov i oboznacheniy. Kazhdyy risunok dolzhen imet' poryadkovyy nomer, nazvanie i ob'yasnenie znacheniy vseh krivyh, cifr, bukv i prochih uslovnyh oboznacheniy, razmeschennyh pod risunkom.

Fotografii. Prilagaemye fotografii dolzhny byt' chetkimi, prigodnymi dlya skanirovaniya libo v elektronnom vide (format .tif, jpg).

Tablicy. Tablic dolzhno byt' ne bolee 3-h. Kazhduyu tablicu sleduet snabzhat' poryadkovym nomerom i zagolovkom. Sokraschenie slov dopuskaetsya tol'ko v sootvetstvii s trebovaniyami GOSTov 7.12-93, 7.11-78. Tablicy dolzhny byt' predostavleny v tekstovom redaktore Microsoft Word (format*.doc) i pronumerovany po poryadku. Odnovremennoe ispol'zovanie tablic i grafikov (risunkov) dlya izlozheniya odnih i teh zhe rezul'tatov ne dopuskaetsya.

DOPOLNITEL'NYE MATERIALY K PUBLIKUEMYM STAT'YaM

Svedeniya ob avtore(ah).

Svedeniya ob avtore(ah) prisylayutsya na elektronnyy adres zhurnala lingv_edu@astgmu.ru otdel'nym faylom, imeyuschim nazvanie Svedeniya_Familiya. Svedeniya ob avtore(ah), kotorye soderzhat dannye: familiya, imya, otchestvo polnost'yu; uchenaya stepen'; uchenoe zvanie; mesto raboty (kafedra, institut (fakul'tet)); zanimaemaya dolzhnost'; kontaktnyy telefon (rabochiy, sotovyy); adres elektronnoy pochty.

Svedeniya v polnom ob'eme privodyatsya na russkom i angliyskom yazykah.

• Familiya Imya Otchestvo
• Uchenaya stepen', uchenoe zvanie
• Dolzhnost' ili professiya
• Mesto raboty ili ucheby (s ukazaniem adresa)
• Kontaktnyy telefon
• Adres elektronnoy pochty
• Tema stat'i
• Razdel

Otvetstvennost' za dostovernost' ukazannyh svedeniy neset avtor stat'i.

Recenziya. Skan recenzii na stat'yu aspirantov prisylaetsya na elektronnyy adres sanya-madzhaeva@yandex.ru otdel'nym faylom, imeyuschim nazvanie Recenziya_Familiya. Recenziya sostavlyaetsya i zaveryaetsya nauchnym rukovoditelem ili specialistov v dannoy predmetnoy oblasti, imeyuschih stepen' doktora / kandidata nauk.

Primery oformleniya spiska istochnikov.

• Bleyk P.G. Sovremennye predstavleniya ob anemii pri pochechnoy nedostatochnosti / P.G. Bleyk // Nefrologiya i dializ. – 2000. – T. 2, № 4. – S. 278–286.
• Aronov D.A. Funkcional'nye proby v kardiologii / D.A. Aronov, V.P. Lupanov. – M.: MEDpress-inform, 2007. – 328 s.
• Gorelkin A.G. Pat. 2387374 Ros. Federaciya, MPK A61B5/107 Sposob opredeleniya biologicheskogo vozrasta cheloveka i skorosti stareniya / A.G. Gorelkin, B.B. Pinhasov; zayavitel' i patentoobladatel' GU NCKEM SO RAMN. – № 2008130456/14; zayavl. 22.07.2008; opubl. 27.04.2010. Byul. № 12.
• Onischenko G.G. Immunobiologicheskie preparaty i perspektivy ih primeneniya v infektologii / G.G. Onischenko, V.A. Aleshkin, S.S. Afanas'ev, V.V. Pospelova; pod red. G.G. Onischenko, V.A. Aleshkina, S.S. Afanas'eva, V.V. Pospelovoy – M.: GBOU DPO VUNMC MZ RF, 2002. – 608 s.
• Ivanov V.I. Rol' individual'no-tipologicheskih osobennostey studentov v adaptacii k uchebnoy deyatel'nosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. biol. nauk / V.I. Ivanov. – Tomsk, 2002. – 18 s.
• Johnson D.W. Novel renoprotective actions of erythropoietin: New uses for an old hormone / D.W. Johnson, C. Forman, D.A. Vesey // Nephrology. – 2006. – Vol. 11, № 4. – P. 306–312.

Dalee sleduet spisok istochnikov («References»), oformlennyy v sleduyuschem poryadke:

• vse avtory i nazvanie stat'i v transliterirovannom variante (ispol'zovat' sayt https://translit.net/, vybrav standart BGN. Okoshko pereklyucheniya mezhdu standartami razmeschaetsya nad strokoy s bukvami alfavita),
• perevod nazvaniya stat'i na angliyskiy yazyk v kvadratnyh skobkah,
• naimenovanie russkoyazychnogo istochnika v transliterirovannom variante,
• perevod nazvaniya istochnika na angliyskiy yazyk v kvadratnyh skobkah,
• vyhodnye dannye s oboznacheniyami na angliyskom yazyke.

Primery oformleniya spiska istochnikov v latinice (References).

• Primer oformleniya knigi: Osipenkova-Vichtomova T.K. Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertiza kostey [Forensic examination of bones]. Moscow, BINOM Publishing House, 2017, 272 p.
• Primer oformleniya stat'i iz zhurnala: Bleyk P.G. Sovremennye predstavleniya ob anemii pri pochechnoy nedostatochnosti [Modern concepts of anemia in kidney insufficiency]. Nefrologiya i dializ [Nephrology and dialysis], 2000, vol. 2, no. 4, rr. 278–286.
• Primer oformleniya patenta: Gorelkin A.G., Pinkhasov B.B. Sposob opredeleniya biologicheskogo vozrasta cheloveka i skorosti stareniya [The way of definition of man's biological age and senility speed]. Patent RF, no. 2387374, 2010.
• Primer oformleniya dissertacii: Ponezheva Zh.B. Kliniko-immunologicheskie aspekty patogeneza khronicheskogo gepatita S i puti optimizatsii terapii. Avtoreferat dissertatsii doktora meditsinskikh nauk [Clinico-immunological aspects of pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C and ways to optimize therapy. Abstract of thesis of Doctor of Medical Sciences]. Moscow, 2011, 38 p.
• Primer oformleniya stat'i c DOI: Bassan R., Pimenta L., Scofano M., Gamarski R., Volschan A; Chest Pain Project investigators, Sanmartin C.H., Clare C., Mesquita E., Dohmann H.F., Mohallem K., Fabricio M., Araújo M., Macaciel R., Gaspar S. Probability stratification and systematic diagnostic approach for chest pain patients in the emergency department. Crit. Pathw. Cardiol., 2004, vol. 3, no. 1, rr. 1–7. doi: 10.1097/01.hpc.0000116581.65736.1b.
• Primer oformleniya stat'i iz sbornika trudov: Kantemirova B.I., Kasatkina T.I., Vyazovaya I.P., Timofeeva N.V. Issledovanie detoksitsiruyushchey funktsii pecheni po vosstanovlennomu glutationu krovi u detey s razlichnoy somaticheskoy patologiey [The investigation of liver detoxicytic function according to restoring blood glutation in children with different somatic pathology]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Astrakhanskoy gosudarstvennoy meditsinskoy akademii [Collection of scientific works of the Astrakhan State Medical Academy], 2003, rr. 388–391.
• Primer oformleniya materialov konferenciy: Mazlov A.M., Vorontseva K.P., Bulakh N.A. Optimizatsiya ispol'zovaniya antibakterial'nykh preparatov v akusherskom observatsionnom otdelenii oblastnogo perinatal'nogo tsentra [Optimizing the use of antibacterial drugs in the obstetric observational department of the regional perinatal center]. Materialy III mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii Prikaspiyskikh gosudarstv “Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoy meditsiny” [Materials of III International Conference of the Caspian States “Actual issues of modern medicine”. 4–5 October 2018]. Astrakhan', Astrakhan State Medical University, 2018, pp. 116–117.
• Primer oformleniya internet-resursa: Gosudarstvennyy reestr lekarstvennykh sredstv [State Register of Medicines]. Available at: http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/ (accessed 11 Febrary 2019).

Publication ethics

1. Introduction

1.1. The publication of materials in peer-reviewed journals is not only a simple way of scientific communication, but also makes a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important to set standards for the future ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication, namely: Authors, Online edition Editors, Reviewers, Publishing House and Scientific Society for the online edition «Linguistics & Education».

1.2. The publisher not only supports scientific communication and invests in this process, but is also responsible for following all up-to-date recommendations in the published work.

1.3. The publisher is committed to the strictest supervision of scientific materials. Our online edition programs provide an impartial «report» of the development of scientific thought and research, so we are also aware of the responsibility for the proper presentation of these «reports», especially in terms of the ethical aspects of the publications outlined in this document.

2. Responsibilities of Editors

2.1. Publication decision

The editor of the scientific online edition «Linguistics & Education» is personally and independently responsible for making the decision to publish, often in cooperation with the relevant Scientific Society. The credibility of the work in question and its scientific significance should always underlie the decision to publish. The editor may be subject to the policy of the Editorial Board of the online edition «Linguistics & Education», being limited by current legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright, legality and plagiarism.

The Editor may confer with other Editors and Reviewers (or officers of the Scientific Society) during the decision to publish.

2.2. Decency

The editor must evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship or political preferences of the Authors.

2.3. Confidentiality

The Editor and the Editorial Board of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» are obliged not to unnecessarily disclose information about the accepted manuscript to all persons, with the exception of Authors, Reviewers, potential Reviewers, other scientific consultants and the Publisher.

2.4. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

2.4.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

2.4.2 Editors should recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts (namely: request a Co-Editor, Assistant Editor, or cooperate with other members of the Editorial Board when reviewing work instead of personally reviewing and making a decision) in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative and other interactions and relationships with Authors, companies and possibly other organizations associated with the manuscript.

2.5. Publication oversight

An editor who provides compelling evidence that a statement or conclusion presented in a publication is erroneous should notify the Publisher (and/or the relevant Scientific Society) for prompt notification of changes, withdrawals, concerns, and other relevant statements.

2.6. Research engagement and collaboration

The Editor, in conjunction with the Publisher (or the Scientific Society), take appropriate action in the event of ethical claims regarding reviewed manuscripts or published materials. Such measures generally include interaction with the Authors of the manuscript and the argumentation of the corresponding complaint or requirement, but may also involve interaction with relevant organizations and research centers.

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers

3.1. Influence on the decisions of the Editorial Board

Peer review helps the Editor make the decision to publish and, through appropriate interaction with Authors, can also help the Author improve the quality of the work. Peer review is a necessary link in formal scientific communications, located at the very «heart» of the scientific approach. The publisher shares the view that all scholars who wish to contribute to a publication are required to do substantial peer review work.

3.2. Diligence

Any selected Reviewer who feels insufficiently qualified to review a manuscript, or who does not have enough time to quickly complete the work, should notify the Editor of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» and ask to be excluded from the review process of the corresponding manuscript.

3.3. Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for peer review must be treated as a confidential document. This work may not be opened or discussed with anyone not authorized to do so by the Editor.

3.4. Manuscript requirements and objectivity

The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment. Personal criticism of the Author is unacceptable. Reviewers should clearly and reasonably express their opinion.

3.5. Recognition of primary sources

Reviewers should identify significant published work that is relevant to the topic and not included in the bibliography of the manuscript. For any statement (observation, conclusion or argument) published earlier, the manuscript must have a corresponding bibliographic reference. The Reviewer should also draw the attention of the Editor to the discovery of significant similarities or coincidences between the manuscript in question and any other published work that is within the scope of the Reviewer's scientific competence.

3.6. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

3.6.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

3.6.2 Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the Authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.

4. Responsibilities of Authors

4.1. Manuscript Requirements

4.1.1 Authors of original research reports should provide credible results of the work done, as well as an objective discussion of the significance of the research. The data underlying the work must be accurately presented. The work must contain sufficient details and bibliographic references for possible reproduction. False or knowingly erroneous statements are perceived as unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

4.1.2 Reviews and scientific articles must also be accurate and objective, the point of view of the Editors must be clearly indicated.

4.2. Data access and storage

The Editorial Board reserves the right to request from the Authors the original (raw) research data, including for provision to reviewers and editors. Authors should be prepared to provide this kind of information to editorial staff (according to the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if feasible, and retain this data for an adequate period of time after publication.

4.3. Originality and plagiarism

4.3.1 Authors must ensure that the work presented is entirely original and, in the case of using works or statements of other Authors, must provide appropriate bibliographic references or excerpts.

4.3.2 Plagiarism can exist in many forms, from presenting someone else's work as the author's, to copying or paraphrasing significant parts of someone else's work (without attribution) to claiming one's own rights to the results of someone else's research. Plagiarism in all forms is unethical and is unacceptable.

4.4. Plurality, redundancy and simultaneity of publications

4.4.1 In general, an Author should not publish a manuscript mostly devoted to the same research in more than one journal as an original publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is perceived as unethical behavior and is unacceptable.

4.4.2 In general, the Author should not submit a previously published article for consideration to another journal.

4.4.3 Publishing a certain type of article (eg, clinical practice guidelines, translated articles) in more than one journal is ethical in some cases, subject to certain conditions. Authors and Editors of interested journals must agree to a secondary publication presenting necessarily the same data and interpretations as in the primary published work.

A bibliography of the primary work should also be included in the second publication. More information on acceptable forms of secondary (repeated) publications can be found at www.icmje.orgwww.icmje.org.

4.5. Recognition of primary sources

The contribution of others must always be acknowledged. Authors should cite publications that are relevant to the performance of the submitted work. Data obtained privately, for example, in the course of a conversation, correspondence or discussion with third parties, should not be used or presented without the express written permission of the original source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as evaluation of manuscripts or awards of grants, should not be used without the express written permission of the Authors of the work related to confidential sources.

4.6. Publication authorship

4.6.1 The authors of the publication can only be persons who have made a significant contribution to the formation of the concept of the work, the development, execution or interpretation of the presented research. All those who have made significant contributions should be designated as Contributors. In those cases when research participants have made significant contributions in a particular area of research, they should be listed as having made significant contributions to the research.

4.6.2 The author must make sure that all participants who have made a significant contribution to the study are presented as Co-Authors and are not listed as Co-Authors those who did not participate in the study, that all Co-Authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication.

4.7. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

4.7.1 All Authors are required to disclose in their manuscripts financial or other existing conflicts of interest that may be perceived as affecting the results or conclusions presented in the work.

4.7.2 Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, stock ownership, royalties, expert opinion, patent application or patent registration, grants and other financial support. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.

4.8. Significant errors in published works

If the Author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, the Author must inform the Editor of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» about this and interact with the Editor in order to withdraw the publication or correct errors as soon as possible. If the Editor or the Publisher receives information from a third party that the publication contains significant errors, the Author is obliged to withdraw the work or correct the errors as soon as possible.

5. Responsibilities of the Publisher

5.1. The publisher must follow the principles and procedures that facilitate the fulfillment of ethical obligations by the Editors, Reviewers and Authors of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» in accordance with these requirements. The Publisher must be sure that the potential profit from advertising or reprint production does not influence the Editors' decisions.

5.2. The Publishing House should support the Editors of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» in considering complaints about the ethical aspects of published materials and help interact with other journals and / or Publishing Houses, if this contributes to the performance of duties by the Editors.

5.3. The publisher should promote good research practice and implement industry standards to improve ethical guidelines, withdrawal procedures, and error correction.

5.4. The publisher must provide appropriate specialized legal support (opinion or advice) if necessary.

The section was prepared based on the materials of the publishing house of scientific and medical literature Elsevier, as well as materials of the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

The editorial board asks the authors to follow the rules set out below in the preparation of manuscripts. Manuscripts drawn up without observing these rules will not be considered by the editorial board.:

1. The requirements, which may be updated in the future, have been developed taking into account "Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to scientific journals."

2. The online edition "Linguistics & Education" accepts scientific reviews, original articles, normative and methodological documents, reviews and informational materials that have not been published before or accepted for publication in other printed or electronic publications. The use of more than 20% of another previously published text is not allowed.

3. The author guarantees that he has exclusive rights to use the material transferred to the Editorial Board in accordance with the current legislation regulating the turnover of intellectual property rights. In case of violation of this guarantee and claims against the Editorial Board in this regard, the author undertakes to settle all claims independently and at his own expense. The editorial board is not responsible to third parties for the violation of the guarantees given by the author.

4. In order to correctly reproduce the published material, it should be remembered that plagiarism is prohibited, which is expressed in the illegal use of someone else's work or someone else's ideas under one's own name, as well as in borrowing fragments of someone else's works without specifying the source of borrowing, in intentional attribution of authorship. Plagiarism is understood as verbatim copying, compilation, and paraphrasing of someone else's text. When using borrowings from another author's text, a link to the source is required. In case of confirmation of plagiarism or falsification of the results, the article is unconditionally rejected. In this connection, when submitting an original article to the Editorial Office, it is necessary to include an opinion on originality in the accompanying documents (http://www.antiplagiat.ru ).

5. The article should be carefully verified by the authors and signed by each of them. The editorial board of the online publication reserves the right to shorten and edit the materials of the article, regardless of their volume, including changing the titles of articles, terms and definitions. Minor corrections of a stylistic, nomenclatural or formal nature are made to the article without the consent of the author. If the article was processed by the author in the process of preparation for publication, the date of receipt of the article is the day the Editorial Office receives the final text.

6. The manuscript must be submitted electronically.

7. The text of the manuscript should correspond to the scientific style of speech, be clear and accurate, without long historical introductions, unreasonable repetitions and neologisms. A strict sequence of presentation of the material is necessary, subordinated to the logic of scientific research, with a clear distinction between the results obtained by the author from the relevant literature data and their interpretation.

8. In the section "Results and their discussion", you should state your own research results in a logical sequence, highlight only important observations; duplication of information in the text and in the illustrative material is not allowed. When discussing the results, new and relevant aspects of this study are highlighted, critically comparing them with other works in this field, and also emphasize the possibility of applying the results obtained in further research.

9. Conclusions should be linked to the purpose of the study, while unsubstantiated statements should be avoided.

10. All abbreviations of words and abbreviations, except for the generally accepted ones, should be deciphered at the first mention. In order to unify the text, at the subsequent mention, it is necessary to adhere to the abbreviations or abbreviations proposed by the author (with the exception of conclusions). The text of the article should not contain more than 5-7 abbreviations.

The author of the article is fully responsible for the accuracy of the information and the correctness of the bibliographic data.

1. Only original, unpublished materials in other publications are accepted for consideration by the online publication "Linguistics and Education". The authors are solely responsible for the scientific content of the article, references, citations and description of sources and literature, as well as for respecting the copyrights of third parties.

2. All materials received by the editors of the online publication "Linguistics and Education" after determining their compliance with the profile of the online publication and design requirements, are reviewed with the involvement of Russian and foreign scientists.

3. All reviewers are recognized experts on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and have publications on the subject of the peer-reviewed article over the past 3 years.

4. The reviewer is appointed by the decision of the editorial board of the online publication.

5. One of the main requirements of peer review is confidentiality.

6. The review procedure is anonymous for both reviewers and authors. Violation of confidentiality is possible only if the reviewer claims that the materials presented in the article are unreliable or falsified.

7. The reviewer is notified that the submitted manuscripts are the intellectual property of the authors and are classified as confidential information. The reviewer is not allowed to transfer the information contained in the articles to third parties who are not members of the editorial board.

8. The subject of analysis in peer-reviewed articles are: compliance with the design of the article with the requirements of the online publication; relevance, novelty and scientific and practical significance of the work; the adequacy of the methods and scope of the study; correctness and adequacy of statistical data processing; the reliability of the results and conclusions, as well as the correspondence between the title of the work and the content of the article. In addition, the quality and style of providing scientific information in the article is evaluated (see review form)

9. Reviewing an article can take up to three weeks

10. Based on the results of the review, the article may be rejected, sent to the author for revision or accepted for publication.

11. The editors of the journal send copies of reviews or a reasoned refusal to the authors of the submitted materials. The responsible secretary brings the decision to the attention of the author.

12. The original reviews are kept by the editorial board for a year. The editors of the online publication do not store manuscripts that are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts accepted for publication will not be returned.

13. If the review contains recommendations for correcting the article, the article is sent to the author for revision. In this case, the date of receipt by the editorial office is the date of return of the revised article. If necessary, the article can be re-submitted for review to the same reviewer who made the comments.

14. If the author is unable or unwilling to take into account the wishes of the editorial board or reviewer, the editors reserve the right to reject the articles.

15. In case of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer, the author of the article has the right to provide a reasoned answer to the editors of the online publication. The article can be sent for re-reviewing, or for approval by the editorial board.

16. The decision to publish after review is made by the editor-in-chief, and, if necessary, by the editorial board as a whole.

17. Articles are evaluated by members of the editorial board, specialists from the Astrakhan State Medical University or other universities according to the profile corresponding to the content of the article. The article is sent for review without indicating the full name. and other data allowing to identify the author. The author has the right to familiarize himself with the completed review.

Publication in the online edition for authors is free.

The purpose of the edition is to familiarize the scientific community with the results of scientific research by scientists from Russia and other countries in the field of language theory, Germanic studies, Roman, comparative historical, typological and comparative linguistics, theory and methodology of higher education.

The main tasks of the online edition are:

• reflecting the results of research, scientific, practical and innovative activities of the teaching staff, students, graduate students and applicants of the Astrakhan State Medical University, as well as the teaching staff and researchers of universities and scientific organizations in Russia, the CIS countries and far abroad;
• organization of discussions on topical issues of science and practice of linguistics;
• expansion of the communicative space for interaction between Russian and foreign scientists;
• drawing attention to the most relevant, promising and interesting areas of linguistics;
• publication of research materials of young scientists;
• informing specialists and the public about the life of the international and national scientific community: about congresses, conferences, publications of monographs, lecture courses and manuals.

Obschie trebovaniya. Stat'ya predstavlyaetsya v elektronnom vide cherez lichnyy kabinet avtora na sayte: «Lingvistika i obrazovanie» Nazvanie fayla Stat'ya_Familiya.

Elektronnyy variant stat'i vypolnyaetsya v tekstovom redaktore Microsoft Word i sohranyaetsya s rasshireniem .doc ili docx.

Parametry stranicy. Format A4 (knizhnyy). Polya: vse po 20 mm.

Formatirovanie osnovnogo teksta. Abzacnyy otstup 1,25 sm.

Mezhstrochnyy interval shapki stat'i – odinarnyy, teksta stat'i – polutornyy. Numeraciya stranic raspolagaetsya vnizu stranicy v uglu sprava. Shrift Times New Roman, Obychnyy. Razmer keglya (simvolov) – 14 pt.

Ob'em stat'i. Minimal'nyy ob'em stat'i 8 stranic, maksimal'nyy ob'em – do 12 stranic mashinopisnogo teksta.

Trebovaniya k sostavu publikuemoy stat'i.

Publikuemaya v zhurnale stat'ya dolzhna sostoyat' iz sleduyuschih posledovatel'no raspolozhennyh elementov:

• «Nauchnaya stat'ya» – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• indeks (UDK) – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• zagolovok (nazvanie) stat'i na russkom yazyke – po centru, zaglavnymi bukvami, shrift 14pt, poluzhirnyy;
• imya, otchestvo i familiya avtora (ov) na russkom yazyke – sleva, shrift 12pt, poluzhirnyy;
• svedeniya o meste raboty (ucheby) avtorov na russkom yazyke ukazyvayut posle imen avtorov na raznyh strokah i svyazyvayut s imenami s pomosch'yu nadstrochnyh cifrovyh oboznacheniy1) (nazvanie vuza, oblast', gorod, strana) – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• elektronnaya pochta avtora (ov), http://orcid.org/0000… – sleva, shrift 12pt
• annotaciya na russkom yazyke – shrift 12pt;
• klyuchevye slova na russkom yazyke – shrift 12pt;
• «Original article» – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• zagolovok (nazvanie) stat'i na angliyskom yazyke – po centru, zaglavnymi bukvami, shrift 14pt, poluzhirnyy;
• imya, otchestvo i familiya avtora (ov) – sleva, shrift 12pt, poluzhirnyy na angliyskom yazyke;
• svedeniya o meste raboty (ucheby) avtorov na angliyskom yazyke (nazvanie vuza, oblast', gorod, strana) – sleva, shrift 12pt;
• annotaciya na angliyskom yazyke – shrift 12pt;
• klyuchevye slova – shrift 12pt;
• tekst stat'i – shrift 14pt, interval polutornyy;
• spisok istochnikov – shrift 14pt, interval polutornyy.

Redakciya zhurnala rekomenduet priderzhivat'sya tradicionnoy struktury napisaniya stat'i (vvedenie, celi issledovaniya, metody issledovaniya, poluchennye rezul'taty, obsuzhdenie rezul'tatov i vyvody). Elementy stat'i otdelyayutsya drug ot druga odnoy pustoy strokoy.

Annotaciya. Ob'em – ne prevyshaet 250 slov.

Klyuchevye slova. ne men'she 3 i ne bol'she 15 slov (slovosochetaniy), nesuschih v tekste osnovnuyu smyslovuyu nagruzku.

Spisok istochnikov. Spisok citiruemoy literatury privoditsya v sootvetstvii s trebovaniyami GOST R 7.0.7–2021. Bibliograficheskie zapisi v perechne zatekstovyh bibliograficheskih ssylok numeruyut i raspolagayut v poryadke citirovaniya istochnikov v tekste stat'i.

Bibliograficheskaya zapis'.

Dlya svyazi spiska citiruemoy literatury s tekstom stat'i ispol'zuyut otsylki v sootvetstvii s GOST R 7.0.5-2008 Otsylki v tekste stat'i zaklyuchayut v kvadratnye skobki. Poryadkovyy nomer citiruemogo istochnika privodyat v sootvetstvuyuschey stroke teksta stat'i, naprimer, [5]. Esli ssylku privodyat na konkretnyy fragment teksta dokumenta, v otsylke ukazyvayut poryadkovyy nomer i stranicy, na kotoryh pomeschen ob'ekt ssylki. Svedeniya razdelyayut zapyatoy, naprimer, [5, s. 23].

References sostavlyaetsya v poryadke, polnost'yu identichnom russkoyazychnomu variantu s analogichnoy numeraciey.

References dolzhen byt' oformlen soglasno sleduyuschim pravilam:

• Avtory (transliteraciya), nazvanie stat'i v transliterirovannom variante [perevod nazvaniya stat'i na angliyskiy yazyk v kvadratnyh skobkah], nazvanie russkoyazychnogo istochnika (transliteraciya) [perevod nazvaniya istochnika na angliyskiy yazyk – parafraz (dlya zhurnalov mozhno ne delat')], vyhodnye dannye s oboznacheniyami na angliyskom yazyke. Dlya transliteracii s kirillicy na latinicu rekomenduem ispol'zovat' sistemu avtomaticheskogo transliterirovaniya na sayte http://www.translit.ru (vybrav pri etom opciyu «MVD»).

Zapreschaetsya ispol'zovat' znaki «//» i «-» dlya razdeleniya strukturnyh elementov bibliograficheskogo opisaniya.

Primer:

Familija A.A. Nazvaniestat'i [Title of article]. Nazvanie zhurnala [Title of Journal], 2005, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 49-53.

• predstavlyat' v References opisanie zhurnala tol'ko v transliterirovannom variante (bez perevoda) nedopustimo;
• pri opisanii izdaniy bez avtorov (sbornikov, kollektivnyh monografiy) dopuskaetsya vmesto avtorov pisat' odnogo, maksimum dvuh redaktorov izdaniya;
• dlya neopublikovannyh dokumentov mozhno delat' samoe korotkoe nazvanie s ukazaniem v skobkah (unpublished), esli ono imeet avtorstvo (dlya ucheta ssylok avtora), libo prosto “UnpublishedSource” ili “UnpublishedReport” i t.d., esli avtorstvo v dokumente otsutstvuet;
• tak kak russkoyazychnye istochniki trudno identificiruyutsya zarubezhnymi specialistami, neobhodimo v opisaniyah original'noe nazvanie istochnika vydelyat' kursivom, kak v bol'shinstve zarubezhnyh standartov;
• nezhelatel'no v ssylkah delat' proizvol'nye sokrascheniya nazvaniy istochnikov. Eto chasto privodit k potere svyazki, tak kak nazvanie mozhet byt' ne identificirovano;
• vse osnovnye vyhodnye izdatel'skie svedeniya (v opisaniyah zhurnala: oboznachenie toma, nomera, stranic; v opisaniyah knig: mesto izdaniya – gorod, oboznachenie izdatel'stva (krome sobstvennogo neperevodnogo imeni izdatel'stva, ono transliteriruetsya)) dolzhny byt' predstavleny na angliyskom yazyke;
• v opisaniyah russkoyazychnyh uchebnikov, uchebnyh posobiy ne nado ukazyvat' tip izdaniy;
• v vyhodnyh dannyh publikaciy v ssylkah (statey, knig) neobhodimo ukazyvat' kolichestvo stranic publikacii: diapazon stranic v izdanii ukazyvaetsya “pp.” Pered stranicami; kolichestvo stranic v polnom izdanii (knige) – ukazyvaetsya kak “p.” posle ukazaniya kolichestva stranic;
• perevod zaglaviya stat'i ili istochnika beretsya v kvadratnye skobki;
• odna publikaciya opisyvaetsya v spiske literatury odin raz, nezavisimo ot togo, skol'ko raz v tekste publikacii byl upomyanut istochnik;
• esli kniga v spiske literatury (v lyubom variante – osnovnom ili v References) opisyvaetsya polnost'yu, togda v opisanii dolzhen byt' ukazan polnyy ob'em izdaniya, nezavisimo ot togo, kakie stranicy izdaniya byli procitirovany v tekste; isklyuchenie sostavlyayut sluchai, kogda ispol'zuyutsya otdel'nye glavy iz knigi; v etom variante v spiske literatury daetsya opisanie glavy, s ukazaniem stranic “ot-do”;
• dlya transliteracii neobhodimo ispol'zovat' sistemy avtomaticheskogo perevoda kirillicy v romanskiy alfavit; ne delat' transliteraciyu vruchnuyu;
• dlya zhurnalov, izdayuschihsya na russkom i angliyskom yazykah, ssylka daetsya na angliyskuyu versiyu zhurnala.

Risunki, shemy, diagrammy. V kachestve illyustraciy statey prinimaetsya ne bolee 3 risunkov. Illyustracii dolzhny byt' chetkimi. V tekste stat'i sleduet dat' ssylku na konkretnyy risunok, naprimer, (ris. 2). Na risunkah dolzhno byt' minimal'noe kolichestvo slov i oboznacheniy. Kazhdyy risunok dolzhen imet' poryadkovyy nomer, nazvanie i ob'yasnenie znacheniy vseh krivyh, cifr, bukv i prochih uslovnyh oboznacheniy, razmeschennyh pod risunkom.

Fotografii. Prilagaemye fotografii dolzhny byt' chetkimi, prigodnymi dlya skanirovaniya libo v elektronnom vide (format .tif, jpg).

Tablicy. Tablic dolzhno byt' ne bolee 3-h. Kazhduyu tablicu sleduet snabzhat' poryadkovym nomerom i zagolovkom. Sokraschenie slov dopuskaetsya tol'ko v sootvetstvii s trebovaniyami GOSTov 7.12-93, 7.11-78. Tablicy dolzhny byt' predostavleny v tekstovom redaktore Microsoft Word (format*.doc) i pronumerovany po poryadku. Odnovremennoe ispol'zovanie tablic i grafikov (risunkov) dlya izlozheniya odnih i teh zhe rezul'tatov ne dopuskaetsya.

DOPOLNITEL'NYE MATERIALY K PUBLIKUEMYM STAT'YaM

Svedeniya ob avtore(ah).

Svedeniya ob avtore(ah) prisylayutsya na elektronnyy adres zhurnala lingv_edu@astgmu.ru otdel'nym faylom, imeyuschim nazvanie Svedeniya_Familiya. Svedeniya ob avtore(ah), kotorye soderzhat dannye: familiya, imya, otchestvo polnost'yu; uchenaya stepen'; uchenoe zvanie; mesto raboty (kafedra, institut (fakul'tet)); zanimaemaya dolzhnost'; kontaktnyy telefon (rabochiy, sotovyy); adres elektronnoy pochty.

Svedeniya v polnom ob'eme privodyatsya na russkom i angliyskom yazykah.

• Familiya Imya Otchestvo
• Uchenaya stepen', uchenoe zvanie
• Dolzhnost' ili professiya
• Mesto raboty ili ucheby (s ukazaniem adresa)
• Kontaktnyy telefon
• Adres elektronnoy pochty
• Tema stat'i
• Razdel

Otvetstvennost' za dostovernost' ukazannyh svedeniy neset avtor stat'i.

Recenziya. Skan recenzii na stat'yu aspirantov prisylaetsya na elektronnyy adres sanya-madzhaeva@yandex.ru otdel'nym faylom, imeyuschim nazvanie Recenziya_Familiya. Recenziya sostavlyaetsya i zaveryaetsya nauchnym rukovoditelem ili specialistov v dannoy predmetnoy oblasti, imeyuschih stepen' doktora / kandidata nauk.

Primery oformleniya spiska istochnikov.

• Bleyk P.G. Sovremennye predstavleniya ob anemii pri pochechnoy nedostatochnosti / P.G. Bleyk // Nefrologiya i dializ. – 2000. – T. 2, № 4. – S. 278–286.
• Aronov D.A. Funkcional'nye proby v kardiologii / D.A. Aronov, V.P. Lupanov. – M.: MEDpress-inform, 2007. – 328 s.
• Gorelkin A.G. Pat. 2387374 Ros. Federaciya, MPK A61B5/107 Sposob opredeleniya biologicheskogo vozrasta cheloveka i skorosti stareniya / A.G. Gorelkin, B.B. Pinhasov; zayavitel' i patentoobladatel' GU NCKEM SO RAMN. – № 2008130456/14; zayavl. 22.07.2008; opubl. 27.04.2010. Byul. № 12.
• Onischenko G.G. Immunobiologicheskie preparaty i perspektivy ih primeneniya v infektologii / G.G. Onischenko, V.A. Aleshkin, S.S. Afanas'ev, V.V. Pospelova; pod red. G.G. Onischenko, V.A. Aleshkina, S.S. Afanas'eva, V.V. Pospelovoy – M.: GBOU DPO VUNMC MZ RF, 2002. – 608 s.
• Ivanov V.I. Rol' individual'no-tipologicheskih osobennostey studentov v adaptacii k uchebnoy deyatel'nosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. biol. nauk / V.I. Ivanov. – Tomsk, 2002. – 18 s.
• Johnson D.W. Novel renoprotective actions of erythropoietin: New uses for an old hormone / D.W. Johnson, C. Forman, D.A. Vesey // Nephrology. – 2006. – Vol. 11, № 4. – P. 306–312.

Dalee sleduet spisok istochnikov («References»), oformlennyy v sleduyuschem poryadke:

• vse avtory i nazvanie stat'i v transliterirovannom variante (ispol'zovat' sayt https://translit.net/, vybrav standart BGN. Okoshko pereklyucheniya mezhdu standartami razmeschaetsya nad strokoy s bukvami alfavita),
• perevod nazvaniya stat'i na angliyskiy yazyk v kvadratnyh skobkah,
• naimenovanie russkoyazychnogo istochnika v transliterirovannom variante,
• perevod nazvaniya istochnika na angliyskiy yazyk v kvadratnyh skobkah,
• vyhodnye dannye s oboznacheniyami na angliyskom yazyke.

Primery oformleniya spiska istochnikov v latinice (References).

• Primer oformleniya knigi: Osipenkova-Vichtomova T.K. Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertiza kostey [Forensic examination of bones]. Moscow, BINOM Publishing House, 2017, 272 p.
• Primer oformleniya stat'i iz zhurnala: Bleyk P.G. Sovremennye predstavleniya ob anemii pri pochechnoy nedostatochnosti [Modern concepts of anemia in kidney insufficiency]. Nefrologiya i dializ [Nephrology and dialysis], 2000, vol. 2, no. 4, rr. 278–286.
• Primer oformleniya patenta: Gorelkin A.G., Pinkhasov B.B. Sposob opredeleniya biologicheskogo vozrasta cheloveka i skorosti stareniya [The way of definition of man's biological age and senility speed]. Patent RF, no. 2387374, 2010.
• Primer oformleniya dissertacii: Ponezheva Zh.B. Kliniko-immunologicheskie aspekty patogeneza khronicheskogo gepatita S i puti optimizatsii terapii. Avtoreferat dissertatsii doktora meditsinskikh nauk [Clinico-immunological aspects of pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C and ways to optimize therapy. Abstract of thesis of Doctor of Medical Sciences]. Moscow, 2011, 38 p.
• Primer oformleniya stat'i c DOI: Bassan R., Pimenta L., Scofano M., Gamarski R., Volschan A; Chest Pain Project investigators, Sanmartin C.H., Clare C., Mesquita E., Dohmann H.F., Mohallem K., Fabricio M., Araújo M., Macaciel R., Gaspar S. Probability stratification and systematic diagnostic approach for chest pain patients in the emergency department. Crit. Pathw. Cardiol., 2004, vol. 3, no. 1, rr. 1–7. doi: 10.1097/01.hpc.0000116581.65736.1b.
• Primer oformleniya stat'i iz sbornika trudov: Kantemirova B.I., Kasatkina T.I., Vyazovaya I.P., Timofeeva N.V. Issledovanie detoksitsiruyushchey funktsii pecheni po vosstanovlennomu glutationu krovi u detey s razlichnoy somaticheskoy patologiey [The investigation of liver detoxicytic function according to restoring blood glutation in children with different somatic pathology]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Astrakhanskoy gosudarstvennoy meditsinskoy akademii [Collection of scientific works of the Astrakhan State Medical Academy], 2003, rr. 388–391.
• Primer oformleniya materialov konferenciy: Mazlov A.M., Vorontseva K.P., Bulakh N.A. Optimizatsiya ispol'zovaniya antibakterial'nykh preparatov v akusherskom observatsionnom otdelenii oblastnogo perinatal'nogo tsentra [Optimizing the use of antibacterial drugs in the obstetric observational department of the regional perinatal center]. Materialy III mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii Prikaspiyskikh gosudarstv “Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoy meditsiny” [Materials of III International Conference of the Caspian States “Actual issues of modern medicine”. 4–5 October 2018]. Astrakhan', Astrakhan State Medical University, 2018, pp. 116–117.
• Primer oformleniya internet-resursa: Gosudarstvennyy reestr lekarstvennykh sredstv [State Register of Medicines]. Available at: http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/ (accessed 11 Febrary 2019).

Publication ethics

1. Introduction

1.1. The publication of materials in peer-reviewed journals is not only a simple way of scientific communication, but also makes a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important to set standards for the future ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication, namely: Authors, Online edition Editors, Reviewers, Publishing House and Scientific Society for the online edition «Linguistics & Education».

1.2. The publisher not only supports scientific communication and invests in this process, but is also responsible for following all up-to-date recommendations in the published work.

1.3. The publisher is committed to the strictest supervision of scientific materials. Our online edition programs provide an impartial «report» of the development of scientific thought and research, so we are also aware of the responsibility for the proper presentation of these «reports», especially in terms of the ethical aspects of the publications outlined in this document.

2. Responsibilities of Editors

2.1. Publication decision

The editor of the scientific online edition «Linguistics & Education» is personally and independently responsible for making the decision to publish, often in cooperation with the relevant Scientific Society. The credibility of the work in question and its scientific significance should always underlie the decision to publish. The editor may be subject to the policy of the Editorial Board of the online edition «Linguistics & Education», being limited by current legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright, legality and plagiarism.

The Editor may confer with other Editors and Reviewers (or officers of the Scientific Society) during the decision to publish.

2.2. Decency

The editor must evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship or political preferences of the Authors.

2.3. Confidentiality

The Editor and the Editorial Board of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» are obliged not to unnecessarily disclose information about the accepted manuscript to all persons, with the exception of Authors, Reviewers, potential Reviewers, other scientific consultants and the Publisher.

2.4. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

2.4.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

2.4.2 Editors should recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts (namely: request a Co-Editor, Assistant Editor, or cooperate with other members of the Editorial Board when reviewing work instead of personally reviewing and making a decision) in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative and other interactions and relationships with Authors, companies and possibly other organizations associated with the manuscript.

2.5. Publication oversight

An editor who provides compelling evidence that a statement or conclusion presented in a publication is erroneous should notify the Publisher (and/or the relevant Scientific Society) for prompt notification of changes, withdrawals, concerns, and other relevant statements.

2.6. Research engagement and collaboration

The Editor, in conjunction with the Publisher (or the Scientific Society), take appropriate action in the event of ethical claims regarding reviewed manuscripts or published materials. Such measures generally include interaction with the Authors of the manuscript and the argumentation of the corresponding complaint or requirement, but may also involve interaction with relevant organizations and research centers.

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers

3.1. Influence on the decisions of the Editorial Board

Peer review helps the Editor make the decision to publish and, through appropriate interaction with Authors, can also help the Author improve the quality of the work. Peer review is a necessary link in formal scientific communications, located at the very «heart» of the scientific approach. The publisher shares the view that all scholars who wish to contribute to a publication are required to do substantial peer review work.

3.2. Diligence

Any selected Reviewer who feels insufficiently qualified to review a manuscript, or who does not have enough time to quickly complete the work, should notify the Editor of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» and ask to be excluded from the review process of the corresponding manuscript.

3.3. Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for peer review must be treated as a confidential document. This work may not be opened or discussed with anyone not authorized to do so by the Editor.

3.4. Manuscript requirements and objectivity

The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment. Personal criticism of the Author is unacceptable. Reviewers should clearly and reasonably express their opinion.

3.5. Recognition of primary sources

Reviewers should identify significant published work that is relevant to the topic and not included in the bibliography of the manuscript. For any statement (observation, conclusion or argument) published earlier, the manuscript must have a corresponding bibliographic reference. The Reviewer should also draw the attention of the Editor to the discovery of significant similarities or coincidences between the manuscript in question and any other published work that is within the scope of the Reviewer's scientific competence.

3.6. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

3.6.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and related to possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

3.6.2 Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the Authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.

4. Responsibilities of Authors

4.1. Manuscript Requirements

4.1.1 Authors of original research reports should provide credible results of the work done, as well as an objective discussion of the significance of the research. The data underlying the work must be accurately presented. The work must contain sufficient details and bibliographic references for possible reproduction. False or knowingly erroneous statements are perceived as unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

4.1.2 Reviews and scientific articles must also be accurate and objective, the point of view of the Editors must be clearly indicated.

4.2. Data access and storage

The Editorial Board reserves the right to request from the Authors the original (raw) research data, including for provision to reviewers and editors. Authors should be prepared to provide this kind of information to editorial staff (according to the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if feasible, and retain this data for an adequate period of time after publication.

4.3. Originality and plagiarism

4.3.1 Authors must ensure that the work presented is entirely original and, in the case of using works or statements of other Authors, must provide appropriate bibliographic references or excerpts.

4.3.2 Plagiarism can exist in many forms, from presenting someone else's work as the author's, to copying or paraphrasing significant parts of someone else's work (without attribution) to claiming one's own rights to the results of someone else's research. Plagiarism in all forms is unethical and is unacceptable.

4.4. Plurality, redundancy and simultaneity of publications

4.4.1 In general, an Author should not publish a manuscript mostly devoted to the same research in more than one journal as an original publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is perceived as unethical behavior and is unacceptable.

4.4.2 In general, the Author should not submit a previously published article for consideration to another journal.

4.4.3 Publishing a certain type of article (eg, clinical practice guidelines, translated articles) in more than one journal is ethical in some cases, subject to certain conditions. Authors and Editors of interested journals must agree to a secondary publication presenting necessarily the same data and interpretations as in the primary published work.

A bibliography of the primary work should also be included in the second publication. More information on acceptable forms of secondary (repeated) publications can be found at www.icmje.orgwww.icmje.org.

4.5. Recognition of primary sources

The contribution of others must always be acknowledged. Authors should cite publications that are relevant to the performance of the submitted work. Data obtained privately, for example, in the course of a conversation, correspondence or discussion with third parties, should not be used or presented without the express written permission of the original source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as evaluation of manuscripts or awards of grants, should not be used without the express written permission of the Authors of the work related to confidential sources.

4.6. Publication authorship

4.6.1 The authors of the publication can only be persons who have made a significant contribution to the formation of the concept of the work, the development, execution or interpretation of the presented research. All those who have made significant contributions should be designated as Contributors. In those cases when research participants have made significant contributions in a particular area of research, they should be listed as having made significant contributions to the research.

4.6.2 The author must make sure that all participants who have made a significant contribution to the study are presented as Co-Authors and are not listed as Co-Authors those who did not participate in the study, that all Co-Authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication.

4.7. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

4.7.1 All Authors are required to disclose in their manuscripts financial or other existing conflicts of interest that may be perceived as affecting the results or conclusions presented in the work.

4.7.2 Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, stock ownership, royalties, expert opinion, patent application or patent registration, grants and other financial support. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.

4.8. Significant errors in published works

If the Author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, the Author must inform the Editor of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» about this and interact with the Editor in order to withdraw the publication or correct errors as soon as possible. If the Editor or the Publisher receives information from a third party that the publication contains significant errors, the Author is obliged to withdraw the work or correct the errors as soon as possible.

5. Responsibilities of the Publisher

5.1. The publisher must follow the principles and procedures that facilitate the fulfillment of ethical obligations by the Editors, Reviewers and Authors of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» in accordance with these requirements. The Publisher must be sure that the potential profit from advertising or reprint production does not influence the Editors' decisions.

5.2. The Publishing House should support the Editors of the online edition «Linguistics & Education» in considering complaints about the ethical aspects of published materials and help interact with other journals and / or Publishing Houses, if this contributes to the performance of duties by the Editors.

5.3. The publisher should promote good research practice and implement industry standards to improve ethical guidelines, withdrawal procedures, and error correction.

5.4. The publisher must provide appropriate specialized legal support (opinion or advice) if necessary.

The section was prepared based on the materials of the publishing house of scientific and medical literature Elsevier, as well as materials of the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

The editorial board asks the authors to follow the rules set out below in the preparation of manuscripts. Manuscripts drawn up without observing these rules will not be considered by the editorial board.:

1. The requirements, which may be updated in the future, have been developed taking into account "Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to scientific journals."

2. The online edition "Linguistics & Education" accepts scientific reviews, original articles, normative and methodological documents, reviews and informational materials that have not been published before or accepted for publication in other printed or electronic publications. The use of more than 20% of another previously published text is not allowed.

3. The author guarantees that he has exclusive rights to use the material transferred to the Editorial Board in accordance with the current legislation regulating the turnover of intellectual property rights. In case of violation of this guarantee and claims against the Editorial Board in this regard, the author undertakes to settle all claims independently and at his own expense. The editorial board is not responsible to third parties for the violation of the guarantees given by the author.

4. In order to correctly reproduce the published material, it should be remembered that plagiarism is prohibited, which is expressed in the illegal use of someone else's work or someone else's ideas under one's own name, as well as in borrowing fragments of someone else's works without specifying the source of borrowing, in intentional attribution of authorship. Plagiarism is understood as verbatim copying, compilation, and paraphrasing of someone else's text. When using borrowings from another author's text, a link to the source is required. In case of confirmation of plagiarism or falsification of the results, the article is unconditionally rejected. In this connection, when submitting an original article to the Editorial Office, it is necessary to include an opinion on originality in the accompanying documents (http://www.antiplagiat.ru ).

5. The article should be carefully verified by the authors and signed by each of them. The editorial board of the online publication reserves the right to shorten and edit the materials of the article, regardless of their volume, including changing the titles of articles, terms and definitions. Minor corrections of a stylistic, nomenclatural or formal nature are made to the article without the consent of the author. If the article was processed by the author in the process of preparation for publication, the date of receipt of the article is the day the Editorial Office receives the final text.

6. The manuscript must be submitted electronically.

7. The text of the manuscript should correspond to the scientific style of speech, be clear and accurate, without long historical introductions, unreasonable repetitions and neologisms. A strict sequence of presentation of the material is necessary, subordinated to the logic of scientific research, with a clear distinction between the results obtained by the author from the relevant literature data and their interpretation.

8. In the section "Results and their discussion", you should state your own research results in a logical sequence, highlight only important observations; duplication of information in the text and in the illustrative material is not allowed. When discussing the results, new and relevant aspects of this study are highlighted, critically comparing them with other works in this field, and also emphasize the possibility of applying the results obtained in further research.

9. Conclusions should be linked to the purpose of the study, while unsubstantiated statements should be avoided.

10. All abbreviations of words and abbreviations, except for the generally accepted ones, should be deciphered at the first mention. In order to unify the text, at the subsequent mention, it is necessary to adhere to the abbreviations or abbreviations proposed by the author (with the exception of conclusions). The text of the article should not contain more than 5-7 abbreviations.

The author of the article is fully responsible for the accuracy of the information and the correctness of the bibliographic data.

1. Only original, unpublished materials in other publications are accepted for consideration by the online publication "Linguistics and Education". The authors are solely responsible for the scientific content of the article, references, citations and description of sources and literature, as well as for respecting the copyrights of third parties.

2. All materials received by the editors of the online publication "Linguistics and Education" after determining their compliance with the profile of the online publication and design requirements, are reviewed with the involvement of Russian and foreign scientists.

3. All reviewers are recognized experts on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and have publications on the subject of the peer-reviewed article over the past 3 years.

4. The reviewer is appointed by the decision of the editorial board of the online publication.

5. One of the main requirements of peer review is confidentiality.

6. The review procedure is anonymous for both reviewers and authors. Violation of confidentiality is possible only if the reviewer claims that the materials presented in the article are unreliable or falsified.

7. The reviewer is notified that the submitted manuscripts are the intellectual property of the authors and are classified as confidential information. The reviewer is not allowed to transfer the information contained in the articles to third parties who are not members of the editorial board.

8. The subject of analysis in peer-reviewed articles are: compliance with the design of the article with the requirements of the online publication; relevance, novelty and scientific and practical significance of the work; the adequacy of the methods and scope of the study; correctness and adequacy of statistical data processing; the reliability of the results and conclusions, as well as the correspondence between the title of the work and the content of the article. In addition, the quality and style of providing scientific information in the article is evaluated (see review form)

9. Reviewing an article can take up to three weeks

10. Based on the results of the review, the article may be rejected, sent to the author for revision or accepted for publication.

11. The editors of the journal send copies of reviews or a reasoned refusal to the authors of the submitted materials. The responsible secretary brings the decision to the attention of the author.

12. The original reviews are kept by the editorial board for a year. The editors of the online publication do not store manuscripts that are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts accepted for publication will not be returned.

13. If the review contains recommendations for correcting the article, the article is sent to the author for revision. In this case, the date of receipt by the editorial office is the date of return of the revised article. If necessary, the article can be re-submitted for review to the same reviewer who made the comments.

14. If the author is unable or unwilling to take into account the wishes of the editorial board or reviewer, the editors reserve the right to reject the articles.

15. In case of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer, the author of the article has the right to provide a reasoned answer to the editors of the online publication. The article can be sent for re-reviewing, or for approval by the editorial board.

16. The decision to publish after review is made by the editor-in-chief, and, if necessary, by the editorial board as a whole.

17. Articles are evaluated by members of the editorial board, specialists from the Astrakhan State Medical University or other universities according to the profile corresponding to the content of the article. The article is sent for review without indicating the full name. and other data allowing to identify the author. The author has the right to familiarize himself with the completed review.

Publication in the online edition for authors is free.

UDK