The article presents the results of calculating and analyzing the incidence of temporary disability of workers employed at an aluminum production enterprise for 2016-2020. In the course of the study, the methods of descriptive statistics were used (intensive indicators, average approximation error (R2), growth rate, progression coefficient). Differences in the frequency and duration of temporary disability for ______________________________ © Бойкин А.С., Куренкова Г.В., 2021 the study period are shown in comparison with the indicators of the Siberian Federal District and the Russian Federation, which require a specific approach when developing measures to prevent and reduce it. A statistically significant increase in indicators for a 5-year period was established both in general morbidity with temporary disability (R2 = 0.9521) and in the class «Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue» (R2 = 0.9079). At the same time, the growth rate of this pathology from 2016 to 2020 was 71,15 %. The analysis of the incidence of temporary disability is the basis for the development and implementation of measures to prevent the harmful effects of the severity of the labor process and reduce the incidence of workers.
working conditions, morbidity with temporary disability, the severity of the labor process
1. Sidorov A.A., Romashov P.P. Mediko-social'naya harakteristika rasprostranennosti zabolevaniy kostno-myshechnoy sistemy sredi trudosposobnogo naseleniya // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskoy gosudarstvennoy medicinskoy akademii im. I.I. Mechnikova. 2009. № 3 (32). S. 13-16.
2. Schepin V.O. Zabolevaemost' s vremennoy utratoy trudosposobnosti naseleniya Rossiyskoy Federacii // Problemy social'noy gigieny, zdravoohraneniya i istorii mediciny. - 2012. - № 4. - S. 6-9.
3. Vagin V.A. Zabolevaemost' s vremennoy netrudosposobnost'yu moryakov transportnogo flota // Zdravoohranenie Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2018. T. 62, № 3. S. 121-125.
4. Gil'manov A.A., Safin R.I. Proizvodstvennye i professional'nye faktory i ih rol' v razvitii zabolevaniy s vremennoy utratoy trudosposobnosti u rabotnikov pticefabrik // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2016. № 6. S. 169.
5. Strel'chenko O.V., Chernyshev V.M., Mingazov I.F., Gerasimova E.V., Semenova V.G. Sostoyanie zdorov'ya trudosposobnogo naseleniya v Sibirskom federal'nom okruge // Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii «Sovremennye problemy gigieny, toksikologii i mediciny truda», Novosibirsk, 27-28 fevralya 2020 goda: sbornik statey. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGA, 2020. S. 275-273.
6. Sudeykina N.A., Kurenkova G.V., Lemeshevskaya E.P. Vliyanie vrednyh proizvodstvennyh faktorov na zabolevaemost' rabotnikov vagonoremontnogo proizvodstva // Gigiena i sanitariya. 2016. T. 95, № 12. S. 1150-1154.
7. Migacheva A.G., Novikova T.A., Spirin V.F., Shlyapnikov D.M. Apriornaya ocenka professional'nogo riska zdorov'yu ovoschevodov zaschischennogo grunta // Analiz riska zdorov'yu. 2017. № 3. S. 101-109.
8. Kurenkova G.V., D'yakovich M.P., Lemeshevskaya E.P. Metodicheskie podhody k ocenke professional'nogo riska rabotnikov zheleznodorozhnyh tonneley // Sibirskiy medicinskiy zhurnal (Irkutsk). 2013. T. 122, № 7. S. 36-40.
9. Shayahmetov S.F., Meschakova N.M., Liseckaya L.G., Merinov A.V., Zhurba O.M., Alekseenko A.N., Rukavishnikov V.S. Gigienicheskie aspekty usloviy truda v sovremennom proizvodstve alyuminiya // Gigiena i sanitariya. 2018. T. 97. № 10. S. 899-9040.
10. Danilov I.P., Zaharenkov V.V., Oleschenko A.M., Shavlova O.P., Surzhikov D.V., Korsakova T.G., Kislicina V.V., Panaiotti E.A. Professional'naya zabolevaemost' rabotnikov alyuminievoy promyshlennosti - vozmozhnye puti resheniya problemy // Byulleten' VSNC SO RAMN. 2010. № 4(74). S. 17.
11. Anan'eva O.V., Gerasina E. V., Drangoy M. G., Kurbatova N. S., Tkachenko K. V. Professional'nye zabolevaniya. Universal'nyy spravochnik. M.: T8RUGRAM Nauchnaya kniga, 2017. 600 s. 12. Danilov A.N., Bezrukova G.A., Novikova T.A. Tyazhest' trudovogo processa kak determinanta professional'nogo riska zdorov'yu rabotnikov sel'skogo hozyaystva // Medicina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2017. № 9. S. 59.
